The AI use cases everyone’s rushing toward are the least valuable ones
16 September 2026
Why this update matters beyond SEO When Google rolls out a core update, the immediate reaction across most organisations is predictable. Teams begin reviewing rankings, auditing keywords and looking for technical adjustments
When Google rolls out a core update, the immediate reaction across most organisations is predictable. Teams begin reviewing rankings, auditing keywords and looking for technical adjustments that might protect or improve performance. While those actions are understandable, they often miss the more important question.
What is Google actually trying to achieve?
The March 2026 core update is not simply another iteration in how search results are ranked. It represents a continued and deliberate move towards prioritising content that is genuinely useful, grounded in real experience, and created with a clear audience in mind. In other words, this is not just an algorithm update. It is a signal that the bar for credible content has been raised again.
For organisations that rely on content to drive pipeline, this distinction matters, because while tactics can be adjusted quickly, credibility cannot.
For years, many content strategies have been built on a relatively simple premise. If you can identify the right keywords, produce content at scale and optimise effectively, you can generate traffic. In many cases, that approach delivered results.
However, the environment has changed. The volume of content being produced has increased significantly, and the average quality has become more difficult to differentiate. As a result, optimisation alone is no longer enough to create visibility. What we are now seeing is a clear shift from optimisation as the primary lever to credibility as the deciding factor.
Credibility, in this context, is not about brand size or domain authority alone. It is about whether the content demonstrates a genuine understanding of the topic and the audience it is intended to serve. This includes the ability to articulate problems clearly, provide meaningful insight, and offer perspectives that go beyond what is already widely available.
In practical terms, this means that two pieces of content targeting the same keyword can perform very differently, even if they are both technically well optimised. The one that demonstrates deeper understanding and original thinking will increasingly outperform the one that simply follows best practice.
The rise of AI generated content has accelerated this shift. While there has been significant debate about whether AI content is inherently problematic, the reality is more nuanced.
AI itself is not the issue. It is a tool and like any tool, its impact depends on how it is used.
What AI has done is lower the barrier to content production. It is now possible to generate large volumes of content quickly and at relatively low cost. On the surface, much of this content appears coherent and well structured. However, it often lacks depth, originality and real world context.
This has created a new challenge for search engines. They must now distinguish not just between good and bad content, but between content that is genuinely useful and content that simply appears to be.
Google’s response has been to refine how it evaluates signals of expertise, experience, and trustworthiness. As a result, content that lacks these qualities is becoming less visible, regardless of how well it is optimised.
For organisations, this means that the margin for producing generic content has effectively disappeared. If your content does not add something new or meaningful, it is unlikely to perform.
The direction of travel is clear. Google is increasingly rewarding content that demonstrates a number of specific characteristics.
First, there is a clear emphasis on first hand experience. Content that reflects real situations, practical challenges and lived outcomes is more valuable than content that simply summarises existing information.
Second, there is a growing importance placed on point of view. Content that takes a position, explains reasoning and offers a distinct perspective is more likely to stand out than content that remains neutral or overly broad.
Third, depth is becoming more important than breadth. Rather than covering many topics superficially, successful content tends to explore fewer topics in greater detail, providing readers with a more complete understanding.
Finally, authenticity is increasingly important. This includes clarity around authorship, transparency about expertise and a tone that feels aligned with real human communication rather than automated output.
These characteristics are not new, but they are now being prioritised more explicitly. As a result, they should form the foundation of any content strategy moving forward.
While this update is often discussed in the context of SEO, its implications extend much further. Content is not just a traffic driver. It is a core component of how organisations communicate their value and build trust with potential customers.
If your content fails to resonate, it does not simply result in lower rankings. It affects how your brand is perceived at every stage of the buying journey.
This is particularly important when considering problem-aware audiences. These are individuals who recognise that they have an issue but may not yet be actively searching for a specific solution. At this stage, they are looking for clarity, not products.
Content that performs well in this environment is content that articulates their problem more clearly than they can themselves. It demonstrates understanding before offering direction. It provides insight that helps them reframe their situation.
If your content jumps too quickly to solutions, features, or services, it risks missing this opportunity. Instead of building trust, it creates distance.
In light of these changes, there are several practical steps that content teams can take to improve their approach.
First, start with the problem, not the keyword. While keyword research remains useful, it should not dictate the entire direction of your content. Focus on the real challenges your audience is facing and build from there.
Second, prioritise depth over volume. Rather than producing a high number of surface-level pieces, invest in creating fewer, more comprehensive articles that provide genuine value.
Third, incorporate real experience wherever possible. This could include examples from your own organisation, insights from client work, or observations from your industry. These elements add credibility and differentiate your content.
Fourth, develop a clear point of view. This does not mean being controversial for the sake of it, but it does mean being willing to take a position and explain it.
Finally, review your existing content with a critical eye. Identify pieces that may be overly generic or outdated and consider whether they can be improved or should be replaced.
The most important takeaway from this update is not that the rules of SEO have changed. It is that the expectations around content have evolved.
In an environment where content can be produced at scale, the differentiator is no longer quantity. It is quality, credibility, and relevance.
Organisations that recognise this and adapt their approach accordingly will be better positioned to build trust, generate engagement, and ultimately drive growth.
Those that continue to rely on outdated models may find that their content becomes increasingly invisible.
If you are reviewing your content strategy in light of these changes, the starting point should not be your tools or tactics. It should be your understanding of your audience and the problems they are trying to solve.
If you would like a second perspective on how your current content aligns with this shift, or where the gaps might be, we are always happy to share what we are seeing across the teams we work with. Just get in touch.